Global governance and comparative analysis of the integration processes in latin america: the andean community and the mercosur
Abstract
The present article aims to present and discuss about the main factors that contribute for the development of the Latin American integration process and how they act on the institutionalization of a future model of global governance through a comparative analysis proposal of concrete cases. Therefore, in the first part, we establish the methodological premises, which are based on the theoretical concepts concerning global governance and the role of the integration processes, characterizing the weakening of the State-nations and their incapacity to give due answers for the emergent and common problems faced by our contemporary society. Sequentially, we focus our attention on the investigation of two concrete cases: the Andean Nations Community and the Mercosur in order to verify the major facts that contribute for the development of these entities and also those ones that, at the same time, demonstrate the peculiar discontinuity of the integration process in the Latin American continent. Finally, we will present a general and comparative overview of the analyzed cases as a way to reflect on the perspectives of the region and how it could contribute for the future implementation of global governance.
Downloads
Languages:
esReferences
Acharya, A. (2012). Comparative Regionalism: A Field Whose Time has Come? The International Spectator, 47(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2012.655004
Casas Gragea, A. M. (2003). El modelo regional andino: enfoque de economía política internacional. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.
Contipelli, E. (2016a). La Comunidad Andina de Naciones y la evolución del proceso de integración socioeconómico en Latinoamérica. Estudios de Deusto, (64), 275-276.
Contipelli, E. (2016b). Estado constitucional cooperativo: perspectivas sobre solidaridad, desarrollo humano y gobernanza global. Revista Inciso, 18, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.18634/incj.18v.1i.562
Contipelli, E. y Picciau, S. (2015). China's Global Order: A New Paradigm in the South South Relation. Croatian International Relation Review, XXI(73), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2015-0012
Cotterrell, R. (2006). Law, Culture and Society. London: Aldershot, Ashgate.
Gonzáles, A. C. (1979). Reflexiones sobre el futuro de la Alalc. Integración latinoamericana: el futuro de la Alalc. Revista Mensual INTAL, (40).
Haas, E. B. (1961). International Integration: The European and the Universal Process. International Organisation, 15(03), 366-392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300002198
Held, D. (2010). Cosmopolitismo: ideales y realidades. Madrid: Alianza.
Paikin, D y Perrotta, D. (2016). La Argentina y la Alianza del Pacífico: riesgos y oportunidades de una nueva geopolítica. Revista Aportes para la Integración Latinoamericana, XXII(34), 67-101.
Stiglitz, J. (2006). Global Public Goods and Global in Finance: Does Global Governance Ensure that the Global Public Interest is Served? En J. P. Touffut (Ed.), Advancing Public Goods. The Cournot Centre for Economic Studies Series (pp. 149-164). Paris: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847201843.00016
Vasconcelos, A. (2007). European Union and Mercosur. En M. Telo (Ed.), European Union and New Regionalism: Regional Actors and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era (pp. 165-185). Hampshire: Ashgate.
Wendt, A. (2003). Why a World State is Inevitable. European Journal of International Relations, 9(4), 491-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/135406610394001
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
