Discriminação de preços de segundo grau: o caso das tarifas multiclasse para o registo de marcas na Colômbia
Resumo
Este documento apresenta uma aplicação de discriminação de segundo grau às tarifas de propriedade industrial, em particular ao sistema multiclasse, isto a propósito da adesão da Colômbia ao Protocolo de Madri em 2011. A metodologia consistiu na construção de um modelo para estabelecer uma estrutura tarifária ótima de registo de marcas com dois objetivos: (i) cumprir com as obrigações dispostas no TLT e incentivar a utilização do sistema multiclasse, e (ii) identificar um mecanismo que minimizasse os efeitos negativos que poderia enfrentar a autoridade de propriedade industrial em matéria de arrecadação, com a entrada em vigência de dito acordo. Dentro dos principais resultados do estudo se identificou a não existência inequívoca inversa entre tarifa de marca e número de solicitações, o que dá espaço a considerar múltiplos fatores que podem incidir na demanda do serviço de registos de marcas diferentes a seu preço. Igualmente, se estabeleceu que este sistema de tarifas diferenciadas amorteceu o descenso dos rendimentos da autoridade administradora de propriedade industrial na Colômbia dadas as características da demanda do serviço observado.
Downloads
Referências
Bonnet, C. & Dubois, P. (2010). “Inference on vertical contracts between manufacturers and retailers allowing for nonlinear pricing and resale price maintenance”. En: The RAND Journal of Economics, 41(1): 139–164.
Braverman, A., Guasch, J. & Salop, S. (1983). “Defects in Disneyland: Quality Control as a Two-Part Tariff”. En: The Review of Economic Studies, 50(1): 121-131.
Chang, R-Y., Hwang, H. & Peng, C-H. (2013). “Technology licensing, R&D and welfare”. En: Economics Letters, 118 (2): 396-399.
Chen, J., Zhang, H. & Sun, Y. (2012). “Implementing coordination contracts in a manufacturer Stackelberg dual-channel supply chain”. En: Omega, 40(5): 571-583.
Corcione, M. (2010). “El TLT (Trade Law Treaty) y los retos para la Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio como oficina de propiedad industrial”. En: Revista La Propiedad Material, 14: 319-326.
Cornia, M., Gerardi, K. & Shapiro, A. (2011). Price Discrimination and Business-Cycle Risk (Working Paper 2011-3). Atlanta, Federal Reserve Bank Of Atlanta.
Felder, S. (2004). “Drug price regulation under consumer moral hazard Two-part tariffs, uniform price or third-degree price discrimination?”. En: The European Journal of Health Economics, 5(4): 324-329.
Ferreira, F. & Bode, O. R. (2013). “Licensing endogenous cost-reduction in a differentiated Stackelberg model”. En: Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 18(2): 308-315.
Gotlibovski, C. & Kahana, N. (2009). “Second-Degree Price Discrimination: A Graphical and Mathematical Approach”. En: Journal of Economic Education, 40(1): 68-79.
Inderst, R. & Shaffer, G. (2009). “Market power, price discrimination, and allocative efficiency in intermediate-goods markets”. En: The RAND Journal of Economics, 40(4): 658-672.
Kim, S.L., Park, C.H. & Lee, S.H. (2012). “Environmental Tax and Licensing a Patent for Clean Technology Management”. En: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57(9): 95-101.
Lambertini, L. (2013). “Coordinating static and dynamic supply chains with advertising through two-part tariffs”. Automatica, Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.11.024
Li, Y. & Yanagawa, T. (2011). “Patent licensing of Stackelberg manufacturer in a differentiated product market”. En: International Journal of Economic Theory, 7(1): 7-20.
Ma, P, Wang, H. & Shang, J. (2013). “Contract design for two-stage supply chain coordination: Integrating manufacturer-quality and retailer-marketing efforts”. En: International Journal of Production Economics, 146 (2): 745-755.
Mendonca, S., Pereira, T. & Godinho, M. (2004). Trademarks as an Indicator of Innovation and Industrial Change. En: Research Policy, 33: 1385-1404.
Matsui, K. (2012). “Strategic upfront marketing channel integration as an entry barrier”. En: European Journal of Operational Research, 220 (3): 865-875.
Mukherjee, A. & Mukherjee, S. (2013). “Technology licensing and innovation”. En: Economics Letters, 120 (3): 499-502.
Nicholson, W. (2012). Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions. Ed South Western. Cengage Learning.
Oliveira, F., Ruiz, C. & Conejo, A. (2013). “Contract design and supply chain coordination in the electricity industry”. En: European Journal of Operational Research, 227 (3): 527-537.
OMPI (1994). Tratado sobre Derecho de Marcas. Disponible en: http://www.wipo.int/treaties/es/ip/tlt/trtdocs_wo027.html
OMPI (2012). Individual Fees under the Madrid Protocol. Disponible en: http://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/madridgazette/remarks/ind_taxes.html
OMPI (2014). List of Goods and Services by Class Order. Disponible en: http://web2.wipo.int/nicepub/edition-20140101/taxonomy/#?pagination=no&lang=en&mode=flat&explanatory_notes=hide&basic_numbers=show&_suid=13896300847410142359155526394
Rosellon, J., Tregear, J. & Zenon, E. (2012). El modelo HRV para expansión óptima de redes de transmisión: una aplicación a la red eléctrica de Ontario. En: Economía Mexicana, Nueva Época, 21(1): 133-173.
Ruiz, E. & Rosellón, J. (2012). “Transmission investment in the Peruvian electricity market: Theory and applications”. En: Energy Policy, 47: 238-245.
Steele Santos, P., Coradi Leme, R. & Galvão, L. (2012). “On the electrical two-part tariff—The Brazilian perspective”. En: Energy Policy, 40: 123-130.
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio (2012). Presupuesto de la Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio ante el Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público. Disponible en http://www.sic.gov.co/recursos_user/documentos/Conozcanos/Gestion/Presupuesto/Formularios_Anteproyecto_2012.pdf
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio SIC (2011). Resolución número 75.858 de 2011 “Solicitud de registro de marcas de productos o servicios, de marcas colectivas, de marcas de certificación y de lemas comerciales”. Bogotá: Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio.
Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio – SIC (2008). Marcas. Guía de propiedad industrial. Bogotá: SIC. Disponible en: http://www.sic.gov.co/recursos_user/documentos/propiedad_industrial/WEB/assets/pdf/Guia_Marcas.pdf
Vargas, C. (2012). Estudio Tasas en Propiedad Industrial. Bogotá: Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio.
Wang, X. H. (2002). “Fee versus royalty licensing in a differentiated Cournot duopoly”. En: Journal of Economics and Business, 54: 253–66.
Watika, S. (2001). “Why has the Unemployment Rate Been so Low in Japan? An Explanation by Two-Part Wage Bargaining”. En: Japanese Economic Review, 52: 116-133.
Willington, M. & Li Ning, J. (2014). “Regulating a monopoly with universal service obligations: The role of flexible tariffschemes. En: Telecommunications Policy, 38(1): 32-48.
Yao, S. (2002). “Privilege and Corruption The Problems of China’s Socialist Market Economy”. En: American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61(1): 279–299.
